A collection of ideas for your interest and for the benefit of my mental health.

02 November 2011

NEVER GIVE UP, NEVER SURRENDER

This one has been on the backburner for a little while.  For want of another discussion topic (and believe me, the killing off of dictators and 'evil men' is something I will talk about one day, to someone), we're gonna turn to one of my most central precepts.  You might call it rule 1.

Kudos to you if you know why this is relevant.
Rule 1: Never Settle

In life I think we have a lot of choices to make which can obviously be as simple as which type of crips you are gonna get in your meal deal in Sainsbury's or as complicated as selecting a life partner.  You might go for ready salted because there were no roast chicken crisps, and this would be kind of disappointing but would leave little lasting effect.  Still, if chicken crisps were what you were after and within grasp, why not strive for that?  On the other hand, if the object of your desires has an intractable character flaw or you're just not as compatible as you would like, you may feel like you can't finish this relationship and find someone better suited to your antisocial quirks.  It might be true, depending on what you believe.  To inject some necessary platitudes there are plenty of fish in the sea, if you love someone set them free (thanks for the save Sting) blah blah blah.  Point remains, if there is a possibility of getting a better deal, or essentially of being happier and more satisfied, change it up and aim for success rather than settling for something which is acceptable.

I have simplified a lot of things there, and of course it can be dangerous to continually stop settling.  There is a danger of 'grass is always greener'ing (another marvellous platitude there for you).  But I feel like my point stands that if you know you can do something, and it is the best thing to do, then you should let nothing stop you! Hell, even if you're not sure you can make a difference, why not try?  If it should be done, let it be done!  Where would we be if we decided that the boundaries of what we know or think were insurmountable and that we could not innovate or push out.  I would not be writing a blog for one.  It might take great effort but you know what they say, a change is as good as a rest. 


This has got awfully convoluted already.  I'm gonna try and be clearer from now on.

To summarise: compromise can be a helpful tool in negotiation, and a necessity in life.  It can in fact help you get the best deal possible.  BUT reserve your compromise until your other options to gain the upper hand have been exhausted, because without trying to improve, to reach your goals and to reach the peak of satisfaction compromise is merely a hollow gesture that will remind you of what could have been and what you are missing.  This past week I read a quotation from Karl Pilkington which resonated.

"Your dreams should never be better than your life. Unless you're a sloth. Cos then you're asleep most the time."

 Now take your Acid Jazz to reinforce the possibilities of your mind.  And get out.

5 comments:

  1. I agree that everyone should be the best you can be, but when searching for something(one) you have to think economically,

    Suppose they're are 10 flavors of crisps identically and uniformly distributed across your preferences which conveniently are ranked from 1 to 10. you go into a supermarket and you find that they've sold out of your top 4 flavors, you've got 2 choices, you take the 6th favorite, or you search again. In this case you have to go to another shop, if the shop is next door your "search cost" is low and you may decide to go look, but if not you probably wouldn't bother. If your expected gain from visiting the next shop (as the expected increase in your happiness from obtaining a flavor with a greater preference level) is greater then the search cost you should elect to search again. you should continue to search up until the point where the search cost is equal to the expected gain of searching again.

    Moving this example to women assume there are 1000 women in society, and they are distributed as before between 1 and 10. you find a woman that you see as an 8, should you search again, bearing in mind that your expected gain of searching again is 1? what is the cost and is it to high? what about if you're with the 999 best woman, your expected gain is 0.005 preference points, should you search again? add that to the fact you simply don't know where the woman you're with ranks and you come to a simple question? should you search again if you're happy? When the potential loss is being unhappy?

    Long one this week mate, sorry eagerly awaiting response

    ReplyDelete
  2. Here the number system falls down, because this abstract 'love' thing can transform any number into a 10 I reckon. Also depends on if you think having a life partner who you don't think is ideal is better than not having a life partner. Someimes being single is better for some people. It's all about perspective. My overarching point is do whatever it takes, within reason, to be your happiest. Am I getting my point across? I'm not sure.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You referenced Galaxy Quest. All arguments are invalid.

    ReplyDelete
  4. ^^ the above is true, I couldn't think of the name of the film though!

    Yeah I take your point that you should do the most you can to be happiest, but there's a costly end to some decisions

    ReplyDelete